AND MISTAKE OF THE COMPETENTE THOUGHT.
THE “RESULT” OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
The whole semantic field of the word “defence” is concerned with this current Course’s theme:
1° The one regarding physical, biological, predatory (including social class predation), military and potentially whodunit, ideological and educational invective. Let us consider the self-managed defense excess’s invective as well. We are dealing however with a cease of deferred defence, which can strive to becoming preventive.
2° We fall however in the current mistake, which is insulting as well, by not placing first in rank the meritorious defence, or otherwise called proactive or “virtuous”: we include here the cases of defending a thesis, as well as a company, a position or one’s idea/thought (even one’s desire: they are synonyms). This is not a preventive defence, but is rather inventiveness, initiative, that provides for its own non-offensive defences only in second order of importance (it is in the paranoid’s and envious’ character to get offended by someone else’s initiative and offend him back afterwards). This is the case of the defence of.
There isn’t even one field of experience that is not concerned with the theme of defence, both of and from.
Every profession regarding defence is concerned with the theme as well: medical, legal, and especially juridical, educational, union, political. As far as the psychologist is concerned, he might actually defend, we don’t deny it but instead hope for it, but neither we can claim this a priori: that his first personal matter is to defend, and his professional class is not able to answer for him (this is instead the doctor’s case, with the exception of what is prescribed by the law). …
Courtesy translation by Bernardo Contri.
Pubblicato su www.studiumcartello.it